The  use of Learning Strategy in Reading of Reflective Learners

Nabila Ayu Nisa

doi:10.54012/jcell.v2i1.52

Authors

Nabila Ayu Nisa University of Lampung

https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v2i1.52

Abstract views: 240

PDF downloads: 99

Keywords:

reflective learners, reading, learning strategies, language

Abstract

The goal of this study was to see if there was a significant difference between the three types of reflective learners' reading learning strategies. The participants were 35 Senior High School students in Bandar Lampung, who were in the 12th grade. The Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT) was used to categorize students into reflectivity/impulsivity, and the Language Learning Approach Questionnaire (LLSQ) was administered to determine students' learning strategy preferences. The data was analyzed using One Way ANOVA with a significance level of 0.05. The findings revealed that reflective learners' reading strategies differed significantly from those utilized by non-reflective learners. According to the finding, Reflective learners used more metacognitive reading methods that were related to their own prior experience and knowledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Annury, M. N., Mujiyanto, J., Saleh, M., & Sutopo, D. (2019). The Use of Metacognitive Strategies in EFL Reading Comprehension. First International Conference on Administration Science (ICAS 2019), 343, 62–66. https://doi.org/10.2991/icas-19.2019.13

Doron, S. (1973). Reflectivity-impulsivity and their influence on reading for inference for adult students of ESL. University of Michigan.

Fontana, D. (1995). Psychology for teachers (3rd Ed.). Macmillan.

Kagan, J. (1965). Reflection-Impulsivity and Reading Ability in Primary. Child Development, 36(3), 609–628.

Kagan, J. (1966). Reflection-Impulsivity: The generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71(1), 17–24.

Maskur, R., Sumarno, Rahmawati, Y., Pradana, K., Syazali, M., Septian, A., & Palupi, E. K. (2020). The Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning and Aptitude Treatment Interaction in Improving Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills on Curriculum 2013. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 375–383. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.375

Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249

Naimie, Z., Abuzaid, R. A., Siraj, S., Shagholi, R., & Hejaili, H. Al. (2010). Do you know where I can find the new center which is called “Cognitive styles and language learning strategies link”? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 497–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.051

O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Russo, R. P., Küpper, L., & Kupper, L. (1985). Learning Strategy Applications with Students of English as a Second Language. TESOL Quarterly, 19(3), 557. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586278

Rahmawati, Y., Pradana, K. C., Novalia, Rinaldi, A., & Syazali, M. (2021). Curiosity and creative characters: The impact on students’ munerical ability. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 4(2), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm

Setiyadi, A. B., & Mahpul. (2016). Language Learning Strategy Questionnaire (LLSQ) : a measurement to identify students’ learning strategies and prepare the success of learning English in the Indonesian context (empirical evidence). Graha Ilmu.

Soltani, K., Tamjid, N. H., & Seifouri, Z. (2015). Iranian EFL learners’ reflectivity/impulsivity styles and their metacognitive awareness of reading strategy use across gender. Ournal of Instruction and Evaluation, 8(21), 103–124.

Sutarsyah, C. (2013). Reading Theories and Practice. Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Lampung.

Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (1987). Learning strategies in language learning. Practice-Hall International.