Rapport Management Framework in Classroom Interaction: A Socio-pragmatic Analysis of Teachers' Utterances

Authors

  • Christian Jay O. Syting College of Teacher Education, Associate Professor, University of Mindanao, Davao del Sur, Philippines
https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v4i3.375
Abstract views: 45


PDF downloads: 25


Keywords:

socio-pragmatic analysis, rapport management framework, teachers’ utterances, face, sociality rights, Philippines

Abstract

This qualitative descriptive study employing socio-pragmatic analysis aimed to analyze teachers' utterances using Spencer-Oatey's Rapport Management Framework, essential for improving teacher-student relationships and enhancing classroom dynamics. A 6-hour classroom observation and interview with 10 teachers were conducted to collect the data. The framework includes face and social rights. In terms of face, it involved the quality face, which comprised well-being concern, dialogue encouragement, openness to diverse perspectives, respect for diverse opinions, feedback and encouragement, fairness and humility; social identity face, which comprised of behavioral guidance, authority establishment, group engagement, effort encouragement, participation seeking, attention direction, guidance of understanding, correctness assurance, and support reinforcement; and relational face, which comprised of managing classroom dynamics, gentle correction, commitment to personalized support, promotion of mutual support, validation and clarification strategy. On the other hand, sociality rights involved association and equity rights: the latter consisted of the principles of involvement, empathy, and respect, while the former consisted of cost-benefit consideration, fairness and reciprocity, and autonomy-control. The results imply that both face and sociality rights can be sources of offense. Face is important for maintaining students' personal/relational/social value, while sociality rights help ensure fairness, consideration and behavioral appropriateness. These elements are important for teachers when interacting with students because they promote respectful communication and strengthen teacher-student relationships. The inclusion of these concepts in the curriculum helps create a positive and inclusive classroom environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustina, S. (2021). Face-Saving and Face-Threatening negotiation by lecturers: Gender and Teaching experience differences. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 5(2), 590-599.

Alnuzaili, E. S., & Uddin, N. (2020). Dealing with anxiety in foreign language

learning classroom. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 11(2).

Aporbo, R. J., Barabag, J. M. C., Catig, B. U., & Claveria, C. M. P. (2024). Face threatening and face-saving speech acts of teachers: A discourse analysis of classroom interactions. World Journal of English Language, 14(3).

Culpeper, J. (2011). 13. Politeness and impoliteness. Pragmatics of society, 5, 393.

Decock, S., & Depraetere, I. (2018). (In) directness and complaints: A reassessment. Journal of Pragmatics, 132, 33-46.

Dowlatabadi, H., Mehri, E., & Tajabadi, A. (2014). Politeness strategies in conversation exchange: The case of council for dispute settlement in Iran. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 411-419.

Ezinwa, O. I. (2024). The Role of Teacher-Student Relationships in Classroom Management and Student Engagement. JALINGO JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, 6(1), 234-246.

Fong, C. J., Schallert, D. L., Williams, K. M., Williamson, Z. H., Warner, J. R., Lin, S., & Kim, Y. W. (2018). When feedback signals failure but offers hope for improvement: A process model of constructive criticism. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30, 42-53.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interactional Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor books

Ibrahim, A., & El Zaatari, W. (2020). The teacher–student relationship and adolescents’ sense of school belonging. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 382-395.

Khan, M. A., Khan, M. R., & Chughtai, I. A. (2020). ESL Learners' Sense of Alienation: An Exploratory Mixed Method Research on the Role of ESL Teachers' Remarking Practices. English Language Teaching, 13(11), 59-74.

Khoshnaw, S. B. H. (2022). Applying the Spencer-Oatey Model for Investigating the Politeness Strategies in EFL Teacher-Student Interactions. Journal of University of Raparin, 9(3), 128-138.

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman

Li, M. (2024). Modeling the role of rapport and classroom climate in EMI students' classroom engagement. Acta Psychologica, 245, 104209.

Li, X., Zhang, F., Duan, P., & Yu, Z. (2024). Teacher support, academic engagement and learning anxiety in online foreign language learning. British Journal of Educational Technology.

Liaquat, B., Rani, K., & Dilawer, M. (2024). Prevalence of Toxic Teaching in High Schools and its Impact on Psycho-Social Well Being, and Academic Progression of Students. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 5(3), 148-166.

Sapoetra, J. (2021). Face threatening acts in pre-service teachers and students: A case study in efl classroom. Biormatika: Jurnal ilmiah fakultas keguruan dan ilmu pendidikan, 7(2), 199-205.

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2002). Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of pragmatics, 34(5), 529-545.

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2005). (Im)Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpacking their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture 1 (1): 95-119.

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007). Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of pragmatics, 39(4), 639-656.

Spencer-Oatey, H. (Ed.). (2008). Culturally speaking second edition: Culture, communication and politeness theory. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-20

How to Cite

Syting, C. J. O. (2025). Rapport Management Framework in Classroom Interaction: A Socio-pragmatic Analysis of Teachers’ Utterances . Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 4(3), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v4i3.375

Issue

Section

Articles