Impoliteness Triggers and Strategies in Students’ Complaints: A Socio-Pragmatic Analysis
https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v4i1.308
Abstract views: 181
PDF downloads: 262
Keywords:
complaints, impoliteness, social media, socio-pragmatic analysis, PhilippinesAbstract
This socio-pragmatic study aimed to unearth the impolite triggers and strategies used in students' complaints extracted from 100 online student complaints. Using Culpeper's Impoliteness Theory (1996, 2011, 2016), the study identified various impoliteness triggers, namely conventionalized and non-conventionalized impoliteness triggers. The former includes pointed criticisms, condescension, insults, unpalatable questions, dismissals, message enforcers, threats, silencers, negative expressives, redundant patterning, and fighting words. On the other hand, the latter involves non-conventionalized impoliteness triggers, which involve form-driven and bald-on-record impoliteness, red herrings, convention-driven impoliteness, rhetorical questions, and inflammatory expressions. In terms of impoliteness strategies, the study found the use of bald-on-record impoliteness, positive impoliteness, negative impoliteness, and sarcasm or mock impoliteness, with withhold impoliteness not observed in the online context. Understanding the linguistic patterns of impolite complaints in online contexts can help formulate strategies to mitigate conflict and promote more constructive interaction among students. This study may provide valuable insights for improving digital discourse and social interaction protocols.
Downloads
References
Acheampong, D. O., & Kwarteng, M. (2021). A pragmatic analysis of impoliteness in
selected Ghanaian social interactions. Journal of English Language Teaching and
Applied Linguistics, 3(3), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.3.5
Arndt, H., & Janney, R. W. (1987). Intergrammar: Toward an Integrative Model of
Verbal, Prosodic and Kinesic Choices in Speech (Studies in Anthropological
Linguistics 2). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Aydinoglu, N. (2013). Politeness and Impoliteness Strategies: An Analysis of Gender
Differences in Geralyn I. Horton's Plays. Procedia- Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 83, 473-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.093
Banguis, J., Divino, P. F., Syting, C. J. O., & Maintang, K. C. (2023). Students’ E-
complaints on the Promises and Pitfalls of Blended Learning: A Socio-Pragmatic
Analysis. Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 3(2), 205-
https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v3i2.225
Bavelas, J., & Chovil, N. (2000). Visible acts of meaning: An integrated message model
of language in face-to-face dialogue. Journal of Language and Social Psychology,
, 163-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x00019002001
Benabdellah, F. (2018). Impoliteness strategies and gender differences among Disney
Modern protagonists. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(4), 40.
https://doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v3i4.p40-50
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage
(Vol. 4). Cambridge university press.
Culpeper, J. (2011). Politeness and impoliteness. Pragmatics of Society.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214420
Culpeper, J. (2008). Reflections on impoliteness, relational work, and power. De
Gruyter Mouton.
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25,
-367.
Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D., & Wichmann, A. (2003). Impoliteness revisited: With
special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of pragmatics, 35(10-
, 1545-1579.
Culpeper, J. (2016). Impoliteness strategies. Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics,
culture and society, 421-445.
Gard, S. W. (1980). Fighting words as free speech. Wash. ULQ, 58, 531.
Ghani, N. (2018). Online Animosity: Impoliteness Strategies and Triggers of Hostility
in a Social Networking Site in Brunei.
Ibrahim, A. H. (2020). A Socio-Linguistic Analysis of Impoliteness in Political Tweets.
International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(1), 64-79.
Ismail, I. N., & Shanmuganathan, T. (2019). Face Threats in Threads: Assessing the
Responses to Impoliteness in Facebook Comments on 1MDB. 3L: Language,
Linguistics, Literature, 25(4).
Jane Xavierine, M. (2017). Impoliteness strategies in the social media comments on
the Low Yat plaza incident. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Malaya).
Kariithi, F. (2020). Aspects of Impoliteness during 2007 and 2013 Presidential
Campaigns in Kenya.
Kim, D. Y. (2008). A study of complaint strategies for EFL college learners. 9(2), 58-
Koshik, I. (2005). Beyond Rhetorical Questions: Assertive Questions in Everyday
Interaction (Vol. 160). John Benjamins Publishing.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. USA: Longman Limited.
Loewen, S. C. (2016). Psychology of Sarcasm—Dealing With Sarcastic People. Retrieved
from http://www.healthguidance.org/entry/15845/1/Psychology-of-Sarcasm--
Dealing-With-Sarcastic-People.html
Merzah, S. K., & Abbas, N. F. (2020). Deception in Flynn’s psychological thriller
Gone Girl (2012): A pragma-stylistic analysis. European Journal of Literature,
Language and Linguistics Studies, 3(4).
Nieto, V. (2020). Defamation as a Language Crime: A Sociopragmatic Approach to
Defamation Cases in the High Courts of Justice of Spain. International Journal of
Language & Law.
Nikoobin, A., & Shahrokhi, M. (2017). Impoliteness in the realization of complaint
Speech Acts: A Comparative study of Iranian EFL learners and Native English
speakers. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(2), 32.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n2p32
Rohde, H. (2006). Rhetorical questions as redundant interrogatives. San Diego
Linguistics Papers, 2, 134-168.
Rosen, R. M., & Rosenberg, C. B. (2002). Suing anonymous defendants for Internet
defamation. COMPUTER AND INTERNET LAWYER, 19, 9-13.
Schroter. (2013). Silence and Concealment in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins Publishing Company.
Shuy, R. W. (2010). Terrorism and forensic linguistics Linguistics and terrorism cases.
In The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (pp. 586-603). Routledge.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition (Vol.
. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Syting, C. J. O. (2018). Politeness strategies in classroom interaction: a discourse
analysis. Tin-aw, 2(1), 1-1.
Syting, C. J., & Gildore, P. J. (2022). Teachers’ Linguistic Politeness in Classroom
Interaction: A Pragmatic Analysis. World Journal of English Language, 12(8),
-141.
Terkourafi, M., Catedral, L., Haider, I., Karimzad, F., Melgares, J., Mostacero-Pinilla,
C., & Weissman, B. (2018). Uncivil Twitter: A sociopragmatic analysis. Journal
of Language Aggression and Conflict, 6(1), 26-57.
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00002.ter
Wijayanto, A., Prasetyarini, A., & Hikmat, M. H. (2017). Impoliteness in EFL:
Foreign language learners’ complaining behaviors across social distance and
status levels. Sage Open, 7(3), 2158244017732816.
Wijayanto, A., Hikmat, M. H., & Prasetyarini, A. (2018). Impoliteness in English as a
Foreign Language Complaints: Exploring Its Intentions and Motivating Factors.
Online Submission, 12(1), 97-104.
Ziegele, M. (2016). Nutzerkommentare als Anschlusskommunikation. Theorie und
qualitative Analyse des Diskussionswerts von Online-Nachrichten. [User
comments as follow-up communication. Theory and qualitative analysis of the
discussion value of online news.] Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mark Aaron A. Dacalanio, Shine M. Cani, Grachelle T. Osiba, Christian Jay O. Syting
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
