Challenges Faced by Islamic Higher Education Students in English Writing Classes: A Qualitative Approach

Authors

  • Amrizal Amrizal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, STAIN Mandailing Natal, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Anjar Setiawan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
Abstract views: 12


PDF downloads: 2


Keywords:

Challenges faced, English Writing Classes, Islamic Higher Education

Abstract

This study looks at the challenges university students face in English writing classes at STAIN Mandailing Natal, Indonesia, using a qualitative approach. Writing is often seen as one of the hardest skills in English as a Foreign Language (EFL), especially at the university level, where students must produce academic texts. Although English academic writing is becoming more important in higher education, there has been little qualitative research on students’ writing challenges in Indonesian Islamic universities, particularly in regional areas.This study employed a descriptive qualitative design and included undergraduate students enrolled in English writing courses at STAIN Mandailing Natal. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and students’ reflections on their writing experiences. Thematic analysis was used to find common patterns in students’ writing difficulties and their views on teaching practices.The findings reveal four major themes of challenges: linguistic challenges, cognitive and rhetorical challenges, affective challenges, and instructional challenges. Students reported difficulties in grammar usage, limited vocabulary, and sentence construction. They also struggled with organizing ideas, developing arguments, and maintaining coherence in academic writing. Affective factors such as writing anxiety, low confidence, and fear of making mistakes further hindered students’ engagement. In addition, students perceived that instructional practices and feedback were often insufficient to support their writing development. The study concludes that English writing challenges among Indonesian EFL university students are multidimensional and context-dependent. The findings suggest the need for more student-centered, process-oriented, and context-sensitive writing instruction. This study contributes to the EFL writing literature by providing empirical insights from an under-researched Islamic higher education context in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Buainain, H. (2011). Students’ writing errors in EFL: A case study. Journal of Education and Practice, 2(6), 1–12.

Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.

Cheng, Y. S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety. Language Learning, 54(2), 313–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00265.x

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dar, M. F., & Khan, I. A. (2015). Writing anxiety among public and private sector students. Pakistan Journal of Gender Studies, 10, 69–82.

Emilia, E., & Hamied, F. A. (2015). Systemic functional linguistic genre pedagogy. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836

Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588049

Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2014). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing. Alliance for Excellent Education.

Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2019). Academic emotions in written corrective feedback situations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.003

Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x

Hyland, F. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00021-6

Hyland, F. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00021-6

Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399

Lee, I. (2008). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.10.001

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.). (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-05

How to Cite

Amrizal, A., & Setiawan, A. (2025). Challenges Faced by Islamic Higher Education Students in English Writing Classes: A Qualitative Approach . Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 5(001), 726–732. Retrieved from https://journal.jcopublishing.com/index.php/jcell/article/view/684