Challenges Faced by Islamic Higher Education Students in English Writing Classes: A Qualitative Approach
Abstract views: 12
PDF downloads: 2
Keywords:
Challenges faced, English Writing Classes, Islamic Higher EducationAbstract
This study looks at the challenges university students face in English writing classes at STAIN Mandailing Natal, Indonesia, using a qualitative approach. Writing is often seen as one of the hardest skills in English as a Foreign Language (EFL), especially at the university level, where students must produce academic texts. Although English academic writing is becoming more important in higher education, there has been little qualitative research on students’ writing challenges in Indonesian Islamic universities, particularly in regional areas.This study employed a descriptive qualitative design and included undergraduate students enrolled in English writing courses at STAIN Mandailing Natal. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and students’ reflections on their writing experiences. Thematic analysis was used to find common patterns in students’ writing difficulties and their views on teaching practices.The findings reveal four major themes of challenges: linguistic challenges, cognitive and rhetorical challenges, affective challenges, and instructional challenges. Students reported difficulties in grammar usage, limited vocabulary, and sentence construction. They also struggled with organizing ideas, developing arguments, and maintaining coherence in academic writing. Affective factors such as writing anxiety, low confidence, and fear of making mistakes further hindered students’ engagement. In addition, students perceived that instructional practices and feedback were often insufficient to support their writing development. The study concludes that English writing challenges among Indonesian EFL university students are multidimensional and context-dependent. The findings suggest the need for more student-centered, process-oriented, and context-sensitive writing instruction. This study contributes to the EFL writing literature by providing empirical insights from an under-researched Islamic higher education context in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Al-Buainain, H. (2011). Students’ writing errors in EFL: A case study. Journal of Education and Practice, 2(6), 1–12.
Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.
Cheng, Y. S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety. Language Learning, 54(2), 313–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00265.x
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dar, M. F., & Khan, I. A. (2015). Writing anxiety among public and private sector students. Pakistan Journal of Gender Studies, 10, 69–82.
Emilia, E., & Hamied, F. A. (2015). Systemic functional linguistic genre pedagogy. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588049
Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2014). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing. Alliance for Excellent Education.
Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2019). Academic emotions in written corrective feedback situations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.003
Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x
Hyland, F. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00021-6
Hyland, F. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00021-6
Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
Lee, I. (2008). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.10.001
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.). (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Amrizal Amrizal, Anjar Setiawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA).










