Government Policy on Student Admissions in Relation to the New Student Enrollment System from the Perspective of Legal Utility

Authors

  • Reyhan Arisena Johan Fakultas Hukum dan Bisnis Digital, Universitas Kristen Maranatha, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Arman Tjoneng Fakultas Hukum dan Bisnis Digital, Universitas Kristen Maranatha, Bandung, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v5i001.638
Abstract views: 36


PDF downloads: 28


Keywords:

Student Admission System (SPMB), utilitarianism, legal usefulness, education, transitional legal reform

Abstract

This research is motivated by the policy shift in Indonesia’s student admission system from the Zoning-Based New Student Admission System (PPDB) to the Residence-Based Student Admission System (SPMB), as regulated under Ministerial Regulation of Primary and Secondary Education No. 3 of 2025. This change emerged in response to various forms of malpractice, including falsification of domicile data, seat trading, illegal levies, and disparities in school quality across zones. From a legal perspective, the new policy is examined based on theprinciples of justice, legal certainty, and utilitarian usefulness particularly the principle of “the greatest happiness of the greatest number.” The study employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, drawing from a literature review of relevant regulations and legal scholarship. The analysis reveals that the Student Admission System (SPMB) has adopted utilitarian principles—subsistence, abundance, security, and equity through the expansion of domicile, affirmative, and achievement admission quotas, as well as the integration of Dapodik (Education Data System) and Dukcapil (Civil Registry) to enhance transparency. However, the system still emphasizes administrative solutions, while structural challenges such as infrastructure inequality, teacher quality, and corrupt mentalities remain unresolved. In conclusion, the Student Admission System (SPMB) represents a transitional legal reform initiative that promises greater equity in access and accountability but has yet to address the root structural problems. It is recommended to strengthen legal sanctions against fraud, accelerate school infrastructure development, implement evidence-based evaluations with public participation, integrate ethical values into policymaking, and promote legal and social ethics literacy programs to reinforce the legitimacy and effectiveness of the Student Admission System (SPMB).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd Rahman, B. P., et al. (2022). Pengertian pendidikan, ilmu pendidikan dan unsur-unsur pendidikan. Jurnal Al Urwatul Wutsqa, 2(1).

Aini, N. (2025, May 8). SPMB 2025 resmi gantikan PPDB! Cek jadwal dan syarat pendaftaran SD, SMP, hingga SMA. Unews. https://

Ali, M. N. (2024, November 20). Mendikbud: Jepang terapkan zonasi sekolah, butuh waktu 30 tahun. Sekretariat Negara. https://

Attar, H. (2025, May 5). Mendikdasmen umumkan perubahan PPDB jadi SPMB, zonasi diganti dengan jalur domisili. Kemdikbud. https://

Ayu Noorsanti, I., & Yudhanti, R. (2023). Kemanfaatan hukum Jeremy Bentham: Relevansinya dengan kebijakan pemerintah melalui bantuan langsung tunai dana desa. Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 3(2).

Bentham, J. (1843). The works of Jeremy Bentham (J. Bowring, Ed., Vol. 1). William Tait.

CNN Indonesia. (2024, June 5). Bima Arya geram PPDB Bogor jalur zonasi terindikasi banyak kecurangan. https://

Diantha, I. M. P. (2016). Metodologi penelitian hukum normatif dalam justifikasi teori hukum. Prenada Media Group.

Endang, P., et al. (2022). Teori utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan hukum atau metode pengujian produk hukum? Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(2).

Fadila, R. U. (2025, May 15). PPDB Jabar, kuota jalur afirmasi di sekolah 'favorit' tidak terpenuhi. https://

Fahmi, K. (2016). Menelusuri konsep keadilan pemilihan umum menurut UUD 1945. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 4(2).

Fikri, A. (2024, August 23). Ketahuan curang, 199 siswa dicoret dari PPDB Jabar 2024. Tempo.co. https://

Fuad, M. (2015). Psikologi kebahagiaan manusia. Jurnal Komunika, 9(1).

Hyronimus, R. (2011). Filsafat hukum. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.

Ibrahim, J. (2007). Teori & metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.

Kaswan, M. J. (2023). An equality of security: Bentham, Thompson, and the principles subsidiary to utility. Revue d’études benthamiennes, 23.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2018, November 20). Ini alasan zonasi diterapkan dalam penerimaan peserta didik baru. https://

Koentjaraningrat. (1985). Kebudayaan, mentalitas dan pembangunan. PT Gramedia.

Kwe Fei Lie, S., et al. (2016). Kebijakan tentang pedoman kawasan tanpa rokok dikaitkan dengan asas manfaat. SOEPRA: Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan, 2(1).

Margareth, R. F. (2025, May 5). Memahami perbedaan PPDB zonasi dan domisili dalam seleksi murid baru. Narasi TV. https://

Montanesa, D., Firman, & Ahmad, R. (2021). Perbandingan sistem pendidikan Indonesia dan Jepang. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(1).

Muskinul, F. (2015). Psikologi kebahagiaan manusia. Jurnal Komunika, 9(1).

Novianti, N. (2024, December 3). 12 kecamatan di Bandung tak ada sekolah negeri, PPDB sistem zonasi sulit diterapkan. https://

Nurjolis. (2025, May 6). Sistem baru penerimaan murid TA 2025/2026 lebih transparan dan adil. https://

Pratiwi, E., et al. (2022). Teori utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan hukum atau metode pengujian produk hukum? Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(2).

Rahardjo, S. (2012). Ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rahmatullah, I. (2021). Filsafat hukum utilitarianisme: Konsep dan aktualisasinya dalam hukum di Indonesia. Adalah: Buletin Hukum dan Keadilan, 5(4).

Ramdhan, T. B., & Fabian, J. K. (2024, November 13). 4.791 siswa di Jabar dicoret dari PPDB zonasi, diduga curang hingga manipulasi data. Kompas.com. https://

Rhiti, H. (2011). Filsafat hukum. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.

Risky, A. P. (2025, May 20). Pendidikan di wilayah terpencil: Tantangan pemerintah dalam pemerataan pendidikan di Indonesia. Sekretariat Negara. https://

Satjipto, R. (2012). Ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Septiansyah, Z. B., & Ghalib, M. (2018). Konsepsi utilitarianisme dalam filsafat hukum dan implementasinya di Indonesia. Ijtihad: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial, 34(1).

Seffrin, D. S. (2024, August 24). Sistem zonasi ala Jepang. Seruni.id. https://

Shodikin, M. (2024, November 12). Teori kemanfaatan hukum Jeremy Bentham: Hukum untuk kebahagiaan dan keadilan. Literasi Hukum Indonesia. https://

Soekanto, S., & Mahmudji, S. (2003). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Zainulrahman. (2024, December 2). Implementasi dan hambatan kebijakan publik di Indonesia. https://

Downloads

Published

2025-07-30

How to Cite

Johan, R. A., & Tjoneng, A. (2025). Government Policy on Student Admissions in Relation to the New Student Enrollment System from the Perspective of Legal Utility . Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 5(001), 603–614. https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v5i001.638