Types of Honorific Address in Male Communication at Universitas Pamulang

Authors

  • Rahmita Egilistiani English Literature, UNPAM, Banten, Indonesia
  • Theresia Ningrum Ratnaningtyas English Literature, UNPAM, Banten, Indonesia
  • M.Renaldi Putra Pratama English Literature, UNPAM, Banten, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v5i001.567
Abstract views: 33


PDF downloads: 15


Keywords:

address term, honorifics, male communication, sociolinguistics, types

Abstract

Honorifics are an essential aspect of sociolinguistic studies because they represent how language reflects respect, hierarchy, and cultural values within a community. This study focuses specifically on identifying the types of honorific addresses employed in male communication within the English Literature Department of Universitas Pamulang. By limiting the scope to the categorization of address terms, the research aimed to contribute a detailed understanding of how men employ different honorifics in both formal and informal settings. A qualitative descriptive method was applied to explore these linguistic patterns. The participants consisted of 58 male respondents, including students, lecturers, and staff, who were selected purposively to represent a range of academic and social backgrounds. Data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, and direct observations, and were then analyzed thematically to identify recurring address terms. The findings reveal that male speakers at Universitas Pamulang utilize a variety of honorifics, such as Bang, Bro, Mas, Pak, Om, Kak, and Kang. These forms indicate a strong tendency to differentiate address terms based on social closeness, hierarchy, and cultural habit.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agha, A. (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge University Press.

Apriyanto, Sigit, Dalman, & Santoso, D. (2020). The urgency of forensic linguistics in a police interrogation process. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 4766–4772. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I6/PR260467

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Dalman, Hesti, & Apriyanto, S. (2020a). Conversational implicature: A pragmatic study of “our conversation” in learning at university. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 4332–4340. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I8/PR280450

Dewi, N. P. K. S., & Subaker, I. W. (2022). The mapping of honorific Balinese address terms translated into English. ESL-Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(1), 146–150. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v5i1.20481

Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge University Press.

Kasiyarno, K., & Apriyanto, S. (2025). Influence of Globalisation on the Shift in Local Language and Cultural Identity. Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 4(3), 372–383. https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v4i3.435

Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Santoso, D., & Apriyanto, S. (2020a). Algorithms of language in speech by the president of republic indonesia. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I6/PR260010

Sneddon, J. N. (2003). The Indonesian language: Its history and role in modern society. Sydney: UNSW Press.

Sukmawaty, S., Andini, C., & Rahman, F. F. (2022). The shift of honorifics due to the promotion as a government official: Comparative study. ESL-Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(1), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v5i1.20817

Triana, Y., Sari, I. F., & Apriyanto, S. (2020a). Language features and causes of suicide case from forensic linguistics point of view. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 7955–7966. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I6/PR260803

Downloads

Published

2025-07-25

How to Cite

Egilistiani, R., Ratnaningtyas, T. N., & Pratama, M. P. (2025). Types of Honorific Address in Male Communication at Universitas Pamulang. Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 5(001), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v5i001.567