The Epistemic Modality in the Inaugural Speeches of Philippine Presidents

Authors

  • Cristy Grace A. Ngo The University of Mindanao, Davao City, Philippines
  • Ramil R. Cubelo Davao City National High School, Davao City, Philippines
https://doi.org/10.54012/ijcer.v3i2.285
Abstract views: 36


pdf downloads: 21


Keywords:

applied linguistics, corpus-based, communicative function, epistemic modality, interpersonal metafunction, systemic functional linguistics

Abstract

This qualitative corpus-based study employing epistemic analysis uncovered the epistemic modality (EM) markers used and their communicative functions in the seven inaugural speeches of the seven Philippine 5th Republic presidents. The findings revealed the preponderant use of epistemic modal verbs with 152 occurrences (81.72%), followed by epistemic lexical verbs with 20 occurrences (10.75%), epistemic modal adverbs with 9 occurrences (4.84%), and epistemic modal adjectives with 5 occurrences (2.69%). Moreover, the top-five modal verbs operated in the presidential inaugurals are will with 97 instances (66.9%), can with 28 instances (19.31%), shall with 9 instances (6.21%), would with 6 instances (4.14%), and could with 5 instances (3.44%). Meanwhile, should and might were never used by any president. In this regard, the presidents are confident, committed, bold, and certain with their statements; some are tentative and quite confident but still communicatively sensitive and polite; and few are uncertain but still diplomatic. Further, the communicative functions of the EM markers were categorized to high-intermediate-low modality values, certain-probable-possible semantic meanings, and close-near-distant epistemic distances.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

E. Adu, S.T. Mensah, & A. Yeboah (2023). An Appraisal of Epistemic Modality in

Selected State of the Nation Addresses. Universal Journal of Literature and Linguistics, 3(1).

https://www.scipublications.com/journal/index.php/ujll/article/view/739

M. Vethamani, U. Manaf, & O. Akbari, (2008). Students’ use of modals in Narrative

compositions: forms and functions. www.ccsenet.org/journal.html

M. Milkovich & A. Sitarica (2017). Epistemic modality in political discourse. Social Studies

and Humanities, 3(1), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-932X-2017-3-1-75-79.

Z. Nemickienė (2019). Means of Expression of Epistemic Modality in Russian Political

Discourse. Respectus Philologicus, 36, 19-31.

https://doi.org/10.15388/RESPECTUS.2019.36.41.20

C. K. Kantorgorje, P. C. Israel, & P. Mwinwelle (2021). Epistemic modality in selected

presidential inaugurals in Ghana. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9, 154-168.

https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.96013

A. Bashir, I. Ullah, & L. Iqbal (2023). Epistemic Modal Verbs in the Field of Linguistics

and Literature: A Corpus-Based Study. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(2), 736–744.

https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i2.310

Y. A. M. Alsbbagh & I. Abdullah (2023). Epistemic modal verbs in Bush’s presidential

speeches: Influencing Americans to support the Iraq War in 2003. Journal of Southwest

Jiaotong University, vol. 58, no. 3. DOI: 10.35741/issn.0258-2724.58.3.77

E. Aning (2020). The use of modal verbs in the 2016 manifesto of the National Democratic Congress Party in Ghana: a semantic investigation. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, volume 25, issue 7, series 13 (July 2020) 39-46.

B. Cornillie (2009). Evidentiality and epistemic modality on the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of Language 16:1 (2009), 44–62. doi 10.1075/fol.16.1.04cor issn 0929–998X / e-issn 1569–9765 © John Benjamins Publishing Company.

F. R. Palmer (2014). Modality and the English modals, 2nd Edn. London: Longman.

H. Abdul-Fattah (2011). A formal-functional analysis of the English modal auxiliaries,

Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literature. Vol. 3 No. 1, 2011, pp. 39-63.

F. Moafian, A. Talati-Baghsiahi, & N. Yarahmadzehi (2018). Modal auxiliaries as Stance-

taking devices in linguistics research articles: a functional Contrastive Analysis.

Linguistik Online https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=664573475004

G. Leech & J. Svartvik (1997). A Communicative Grammar of English (2nd ed., p. 75).

London: Pearson Educational Limited.

T. D. Hardjanto & N. Mazia (2019). “We believe in democracy…”: Epistemic Modality in

Justin Trudeau’s Political Speeches. Jurnal Humaniora, 31(2), 130-141.

https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v31i2.44948

M. Narte & F. Yankson (2014). A semantic investigation into the use of modal auxiliary

verbs in the manifesto of a Ghanian political party. International Journal of Humanities and

Social Science, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 23.

I. Umeh & E. Anyanwu (2020). The semantics of modal auxiliary verbs in the 2018 second

term inaugural speech of Governor Willie Obiano in Anambra State. Interdisciplinary Journal

of African & Asian Studies (IJAAS), Volume 6, No. 1.

W. Zhao (2021). Study on interpersonal function of modal auxiliaries in Obama’s 2009

inaugural address. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, ISSN 2706-682, Vol. 3,

Issue 18: 79-83, DOI: 10.25236/IJFS.2021.031812

A. Huesca-Palmares (2018). A corpus-driven analysis of the inaugural addresses of the three

Philippine presidents.

http://ethesisarchive.library.tu.ac.th/thesis/2017/TU_2017_5921042015_8560_6888.pdf

M. A. K. Halliday (2004). On the “Architecture” of Human Language. In M. A. K. Halliday,

& J. J. Webster (Eds.), On Language and Linguistics (Vol. 3, The Collected Works of

M.A.K. Halliday) (pp. 18, 49). London: London University Press.

F. R. Palmer (1979). Modality and the English modals. London: Longman.

Z. Xu (2015). Modality and Evidentially in Political Discourse: A Cognitive Functional

Account . Doctoral Dissertation, Lancaster: Lancaster University.

L. Hoye (1997). Adverbs and modality in English. London: Longman.

M. Vukovi´c 2014. “Strong Epistemic Modality in Parliamentary Discourse.” Open

Linguistics 1(1):37–52.

Rahmawati (2020). An analysis of mood and modality in Jokowi’s inauguration speech.

Unpublished thesis, Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia.

R. Ekawati (2019). Power through linguistic modalities in Indonesian presidential speeches.

https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2019-1-5

Klinge, A., & Muller, H. H. (Eds.) (2010). Introduction. In Modality: Studies in form and

function (pp. 1-4). Equinox Publishing Limited.

Newson, M. (2008). The even yearbook 8. Department of English Linguistics, Eötvös Loránd

University, Budapest ISSN 1218-8808, http://seas3.elte.hu/delg/publications/even.

Collins, (2009). Modals and Quasi-Modals in English. Amsterdam and New York:

Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042029095

Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.

Shi, L. (2021). Viewing Joe Biden’s victory speech in 2020 from the perspective of language

metafunction. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT), vol. 4,

issue 7. DOI: 10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.7.12

Ngula, R. S. (2015). Epistemic Modality in Social Science Research Articles Written by

Ghanaian Authors: A Corpus-Based Study of Disciplinary and Native vs. Non-Native

Variations. Doctoral Dissertation, Lancaster: Lancaster University.

Simon-Vandenbergen, A. (1997). Modal (un)certainty in political discourse. Language

Sciences, 19(4), 341- 356.

Campbell, K. K. & Jamieson, K. H. (2008). Deeds Done in Words: Presidential Rhetoric and

the Genres of Governance. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Meyenburg, I. (2022). “Brexit means Brexit!”: investigating the production of social

phenomena in political discourses. Symbolic Interaction, Vol. 45, Issue 4, pp.

–595, ISSN: 0195-6086 print/1533-8665 online.

Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie. 2000. “The Functions of I think in Political Discourse.”

International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10(1):41–63.

Dou, X. (2019). Modal operators and personal pronouns in Roosevelt’s inaugural addresses.

Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 9, No. 8, pp. 984-989. DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0908.14.

Opeyemi, M. O., & Ajoke. I. O. (2019). Linguistic Modality in Ghanaian President Nana

Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo’s 2017 Inaugural Address. European Journal of Social Sciences,

, 134-142.

Adu, E. J. (2015). Epistemic Modality in Political Discourse—A Study of Two Selected State

of the Nation Addresses by Ex-President John A. Kufuor of Ghana. Unpublished M.Phil.

Thesis. http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijl/article/view/799

Quirk, R. S., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of

the English language. Hawlow: Longman.

Hart, C. & Cap, P. (Eds.) (2014). Introduction. In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies

(pp. 1-15). London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-14

How to Cite

NGO, C. G. A., & Cubelo, R. R. (2024). The Epistemic Modality in the Inaugural Speeches of Philippine Presidents. International Journal Corner of Educational Research, 3(2), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.54012/ijcer.v3i2.285

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): November

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Cristy Grace A. Ngo, Ramil R. Cubelo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.