Online Implementation of Project-Based Learning (PJBL) on Students' Capacity for Creative Thinking
https://doi.org/10.54012/ijcer.v4i3.705
Abstract views: 10
PDF downloads: 5
Keywords:
Collaboration, Online Learning, Computer-Supported, Students' Capacity , Creative ThinkingAbstract
Creative thinking is the process of coming up with original, adaptable, and visually appealing solutions to problems. Creative thinking is the continuous process of thinking about and creating creative things in order to achieve objectives. Students find the project-based learning approach and the learning process to be interesting experiences. Student learning experiences with the upcoming project serve as the focus of the instructional materials. Students learn more and feel more motivated to complete assigned projects when they are given real-world experience in the learning process. Students learn more and feel more motivated to complete the assigned project when they are given real-world experience in the learning process. Creative thinking is the process of coming up with original, adaptable, and visually appealing solutions to problems. This study looked into how collaboration between groups improved collaborative learning groups' performance on project-based learning tasks and the co-construction of knowledge. The findings of two case studies, one on between-group mentoring and one on between-group project review, revealed that both strategies were viewed favorably by the students and had a positive impact on all students' project performance, particularly in the less effective groups, as well as the knowledge revealed through their online dialogue. The findings shed some light on how students in higher education engage in computer-supported collaborative learning.
Downloads
References
A. W. Chickering and Z. F. Gamson, “Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education,” AAHE Bulletin, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 3–7, 1987.
M. B. Baxter Magolda, Knowing and Reasoning in College: Gender-Related Patterns in Students’ Intellectual Development. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass, 1992.
E. T. Pascarella and P. T. Terenzini, How College Affects Students. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass, 1998.
T. Koschmann, CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996.
National Research Council, National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press, 1996.
American Psychological Association, Learner-Centered Psychological Principles. Washington, DC, USA: APA, 2002.
National Science Foundation, Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education. Arlington, VA, USA, 1996.
Institute for Higher Education Policy, Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet-Based Distance Education. Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
R. Poell, F. Van der Krogt, and D. Wildemeersch, “Learning-projects in organizations,” International Journal of Lifelong Education, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 60–70, 1998.
A. Morgan, Theoretical Aspects of Project-Based Learning. London, U.K.: Routledge, 1987.
D. Livingstone and K. Lynch, “Group project work and student-centered learning,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 325–338, 2000.
G. Salomon, Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993.
P. Abrami, B. Poulsen, and B. Chambers, Classroom Connections: Understanding and Using Cooperative Learning. Toronto, Canada: Harcourt Brace, 1995.
T. Harrison and K. Stephen, “Socially situated learning,” Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 15–23, 1996.
L. B. Resnick, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Erlbaum, 1989.
R. Bernard, E. Lou, and P. Abrami, “How does distance education compare with classroom instruction?,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 379–439, 2003.
R. E. Clark, “Reconsidering research on learning from media,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 445–459, 1983.
R. E. Clark, “Media will never influence learning,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 21–29, 1994.
R. E. Clark, “Media and learning debates,” Educational Technology Research, 2000.
R. Kozma, “Learning with media,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 179–211, 1991.
R. Kozma, “Will media influence learning?,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 7–19, 1994.
P. Smith and C. Dillon, “Comparing distance learning and classroom learning,” American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 6–23, 1999.
R. Palloff and K. Pratt, Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass, 1999.
F. Wang, J. Pool, M. Harris, and J. Wangemann, “Promoting online collaborative learning,” Distance Education, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 323–346, 2001.
S. Hiltz, E. Fjermestad, and S. Lewis, “The virtual classroom,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 7–55, 1999.
C. De Simone, Y. Lou, and R. Schmid, “Collaborative learning in distance education,” Journal of Distance Education, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 45–60, 2001.
L. Rendon, “Validating culturally diverse students,” Innovative Higher Education, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 33–51, 1994.
V. Tinto, “Colleges as communities,” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 599–623, 1998.
G. Thomas and S. MacGregor, “Online group collaboration in project-based learning,” Educational Technology Research, in press.
E. Wenger, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997.
Y. Lou, H. Dedic, and S. Rosenfield, “Intergroup collaboration in online learning,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 345–365, 2003.
J. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2002.
P. Kouros, “SAGE collaborative learning questionnaire,” Univ. Alberta, Canada, 2000.
F. Henri, “Computer conferencing and content analysis,” in Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing, Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1991.
H. Mellar et al., “Content analysis of online discussion,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 15, pp. 160–176, 1999.
C. Angeli, N. Valanides, and C. Bonk, “Communication in CSCL,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 455–475, 2003.
B. Dodge, “WebQuest: A technique for Internet-based learning,” Distance Educator, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 10–15, 1995.
B. Dodge, “Five rules for writing WebQuests,” Learning & Leading with Technology, 2001.
J. W. Creswell, “Mixed methods research,” Educational Researcher, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 14–26, 2002.
K. Lee and S. Majors, “Understanding collaborative dynamics,” Educational Technology Research, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 65–78, 2003.
F. Henri, “Analyzing interaction in computer conferencing,” Instructional Science, vol. 21, pp. 201–223, 1992.
M. Mellar et al., “Analyzing online discussion,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 1999.
C. Angeli et al., “Critical thinking in online collaboration,” Educational Media International, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 231–245, 2003.
B. Dodge, “WebQuest design,” San Diego State Univ., 1995.
B. Dodge, “WebQuest rubric,” 2001.
P. Kouros, “Student Attitudes toward Group Environments (SAGE),” 2000.
E. Wenger, “Communities of practice and learning,” Organization Science, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 225–246, 1997.
Y. Lou et al., “Self-regulation and feedback in e-learning,” Computers & Education, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 24–33, 2013.
D. Schallert, J. Reed, and the D-Team, “Peer interaction in online discussion,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 275–289, 2003–2004.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Samsi, Disman, Eeng Ahman, A Sobandi, Hari Mulyadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
